Nurse Burnout and Quality of Care Literature Evaluation Table

In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. The ability to articulate research data and summarize relevant content supports the student’s ability to further develop and synthesize the assignments that constitute the components of the capstone project.

The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

For this assignment, provide a synopsis of the review of the research literature. Using the “Literature Evaluation Table,” determine the level and strength of the evidence for each of the eight research articles you have selected. The articles should be current (within the last 5 years) and closely relate to the PICOT question developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project Nurse Burnout and Quality of Care Literature Evaluation Table.

ORDER YOUR PAPER HERE

Literature Evaluation Table Student Name: Change Topic (2-3 sentences): Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Author, Journal (PeerReviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Article Title and Year Published Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative) Purposes/Aim of Study Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) Setting/Sample Methods: Intervention/Instruments Analysis Key Findings Recommendations Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project © 2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Article 4 Criteria Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Author, Journal (PeerReviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Article Title and Year Published Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative) Purposes/Aim of Study Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) Setting/Sample Methods: Intervention/Instruments Analysis Key Findings Recommendations Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone © 2017. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Article 8 Running head: NURSE BURNOUT AND THE QUALITY OF CARE Nurse Burnout and the Quality of Care Michelle Kolibas Grand Canyon University: NRS-493 June 7, 2020 1 NURSE BURNOUT 2 Nurse Burnout and the Quality of Care Nursing operations often create a stressful environment, mentally, emotionally, and physically leading to burnout, which can have an influence on the nurse’s life and close family members. Nurse burnout is a common phenomenon within the medical fraternity Nurse Burnout and Quality of Care Literature Evaluation Table.

The condition is manifested by a decrease in the energy of a practicing nurse, and it is characterized by reduced motivation, emotional exhaustion, and frustration. Burnout is a leading cause of a decrease in work efficacy. This paper looks into the role played by burnout and its consequent effects on the efficiency of nurses to patients currently receiving nursing interventions. In the end, the primary question that the paper seeks to provide answers to is: does burnout influence the quality of nursing care? Prolonged serving hours coupled with unfavorable working conditions, low salaries, level of qualification, and the emergence of new health complications are some of the leading causes of nurse burnout. A study by Maslach and Leiter (2016) posits that descriptive statistics form a foundational base used to relay various traits or characteristics of nurses from different operating contexts. Nurse burnout scores are evaluated using multiple guidelines provided in nursing manuals and medical analytic determinants (Tak, Curlin, & Yoon, 2017). Close one-to-one contact with patients receiving nursing care and interventions within complex-practice environments or conditions predispose most nurses to burnout. Subsequently, this leads to effects on quality of care and job performance. This discussion concurs with findings by Maslach and Leiter (2016), who suggested that nurses around the world continue to face similar challenges despite economic, social, and cultural diversities as well as healthcare systems. Providing safe and eminent quality care within a context characterized by severe nursing shortage and persistent burnout is a challenging encounter (West, Dyrbye, & Erwin, 2016). Formulating, testing, and effectively implementing reliable intervention measures to cut down burnout is likely to produce several NURSE BURNOUT 3 beneficial impacts, including maintaining nurses in clinical ranks, and safeguarding or raising the quality of care (Maslach & Leiter, 2016). Previous evidence and analyses of existing data indicate a close link between nurse burnout and nurse-associated quality of care (Tak, Curlin, & Yoon, 2017)Nurse Burnout and Quality of Care Literature Evaluation Table.

Similarly, a study by Shanafelt, Goh, and Sinsky (2017) found out that high nurse burnout levels are critically related to nurses’ assessments of the quality of care, nursing independence, nursing interventions, operating or working conditions, and other related elements. Cross-sectoral analysis and comparative studies also have a significant contribution to the wealth of knowledge and skills about a particular health care agency and global challenges facing nursing practice (Maslach & Leiter, 2016). Despite the use of similar study and analytic approaches and the use of matching instruments to determine the effects of burnout, some variations are likely to emerge. For example, nurses from specific health care settings may opt to offer services from their employing agencies or hospitals, while others may choose to operate in a home-based care setting (Tak, Curlin, & Yoon, 2017). Therefore, it might be unclear to what extent such differences might influence nurses’ burnout levels and perceptions. According to West, Dyrbye, and Erwin (2016), such variations may pose unnecessary limitations to finding a water-tight reply to a health study question. In conclusion, high levels of nurse burnout are primarily linked to a significant likelihood of a nurse’s rating of the quality of care as average or weak. The relationship between burnout and quality of care deserves extensive study and further discussion. Burnout is a critical indicator for both practice leaders and human resources at all levels within a medical context, and it determines issues related to the quality of care. Making efforts to reduce nurse burnout is a highly applicable technique for improving nurse-rated quality of care, specifically in the setting of an escalating shortage of nursing professionals and the NURSE BURNOUT 4 increasing need to tackle challenges with consistency, safety, and quality care within health systems globally. Despite the convenience of global ratings and determinants of quality of care, in the expected after-days, more studies need to consider determining the quality of nursing care by employing the use of multi-dimensional elements and evidence-based solutions that capture extra factors of the quality of nursing intervention and care. NURSE BURNOUT 5 References List Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2): 103–111. Shanafelt, T., Goh, J., & Sinsky, C. (2017)Nurse Burnout and Quality of Care Literature Evaluation Table.

The business case for investing in physician wellbeing. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177(12): 1826–1832. Tak, H. J., Curlin, F. A., & Yoon, J. D. (2017). Association of intrinsic motivating factors and markers of physician well-being: A national physician survey. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 32(7): 739–746. West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., & Erwin, P. J. (2016). Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet, 388(10057): 2272–2281. Nurse Burnout and Quality of Care Literature Evaluation Table