Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics Essay Paper
| Article Citation and Permalink
(APA format) |
Jahan, S., & Al-Saigul, A. M. (2017). Primary health care research in Saudi Arabia: A quantitative analysis. International journal of health sciences, 11(2), 9. |
| Point | Description |
| Broad Topic Area/Title | Primary health care research in Saudi Arabia: A quantitative analysis
ORDER YOUR PAPER HERE |
| Problem Statement
(What is the problem research is addressing?) |
Saudi Arabia experiences a significant disparity in the practical implementation of PHC studies. Therefore, in order to evaluate the scientific advancement of institutions, a quantitative analysis on publications is needed. |
| Purpose Statement
(What is the purpose of the study?) |
The purpose of this study is to review Saudi Arabia’s primary healthcare research and to determine the distribution of publications across regional, subject, organizational, and time structures Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics Essay Paper. |
| Research Questions
(What questions does the research seek to answer?) |
What is Saudi Arabia’s usual research output?
What geographic areas deliver the most relevant scientific studies? What are the dissemination trends in institution, period, place and subject contexts for publications? |
| Define Hypothesis
(Or state the correct hypothesis based upon variables used) |
The hypothesis of the study is that reviewing Saudi Arabia’s PHC publications may be effective in determining scientific work production and dissemination trends. |
| Identify Dependent and Independent Variables and Type of Data for the Variables | · First author’s institution team – All the publications analyzed in the sample included details on the institutional identity of the author. Institutions were also grouped, using various dimensions like Military Institutions, Special Hospitals, and special facilities, University, etc. Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics Essay Paper
· Geographical location of institutions – The authors’ institutional identity was used to classify publications in their respective institutions. Moreover, organizations within Saudi Arabia were categorized by region, whereas those not within the state borders were listed as “institutions outside Saudi Arabia (Jahan & Al-Saigul, 2017)”.
|
| Population of Interest for Study | The analysis searched publications in two repositories, Google Scholar and PubMed, posted from May 2012 to April 2013. It also covered reviews, case studies, and original research excluding book reviews, meetings, and corrections. |
| Sample | 655 PHC publications |
| Sampling Method | Three MeSH terms, “Saudi”, “Primary care,” and “Primary health,” were used to extract relevant articles from the Google Scholar and PubMed databases. The articles were also supposed to be published between May 2012 and April 2013 (Jahan & Al-Saigul, 2017, pp. 10).
|
| Identify Data Collection
Identify how data were collected |
A coding device was used to collect relevant details from all of the papers chosen. The device worked under the elements that include article title, geographic area, institutional affiliation of the first author, publication year, framework of the research, design of the analysis, journal name, and MeSH term. |
| Summarize Data Collection Approach | The research implemented the MeSH technique that was approved by the US National Library of Medicine for standardization objectives. The method includes MeSH terminology, which may be changed to varying extents of precision. It also combines narrow as well as broad headings that were necessary in the search for articles. Upon reviewing the abstract of a research article the text box “MeSH on-demand” was utilized to determine study topics. The research group then had to decide on a related MeSH term, which was used to collect the MeSH descriptor information. After that, the relevant MeSH terms were loaded into the coding program. |
| Discuss Data Analysis
Include what types of statistical tests were used for the variables. |
Epi info version 3.5.4. was used to measure the parameters of the variables involved (Jahan & Al-Saigul, 2017)
|
| Summarize Results of Study | The coding program recorded 655 articles of PHC that were published between 1983 and 2011, and the number increased over time. Additionally, original research articles (86%) made up most of the articles, while cross-sectional analysis (93%) became the most commonly used form of study. The most commonly used research topics included “chronic illnesses” and “research on healthcare services.” Several articles were from the Riyadh province (46%), then universities (52%), and lastly, the Ministry of Health (24%). |
| Summary of Assumptions and Limitations
Identify the assumptions and limitations from the article. Report other potential assumptions and limitations of your review not listed by the author. |
The study’s most significant drawback is that it examines only the quantitative dimension of Saudi Arabia’s articles, and totally ignores quality. The study also concluded that the papers found in the Google Scholar and PubMed repositories would accurately reflect Saudi Arabia’s scientific output. In addition, differences in indexing patterns influenced the database search, and certain articles could not be found. Certain abstracts did not give appropriate details to recognize several papers’ variables. Furthermore, the study did not consider suitable MeSH terminology for periodic research, which would potentially result in misclassifying many articles. |
Ethical Considerations
Ethics is an essential pillar in carrying out good research. There is substantial scope for violating consent of the parties involved in the data collection process. Clearly, certain participants could forbid the usage of their medical details in future research, which in this research reflects a possible ethical concern. The researchers and the institution should understand in prospective research that presenting details, such as regional distribution of articles and key topics, does not violate consent agreement.
ORDER YOUR PAPER HERE
Additionally, the research findings may possibly breach the principle of Beneficence. The principle requires scholars to develop theories and perform appropriate work to better serve the beneficiaries. In this sense, scientists and healthcare professionals may face major ethical concerns where the research results do not meet the required level of competence. Research teams also ought to recognize what aspects of an analysis could be “detrimental” for minimizing social, psychological, emotional, and economic implications. For example, according to Jahan & Al-Saigul (2017), most research in Saudi Arabia is adopting cross-sectional designs for studies Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics Essay Paper
There is therefore a weakness in designs of analytical study which give more credible proof technically. Certain readers may use this argument to conclude that adequate research is missing in Saudi Arabia which could pose ethical concerns within organizations and healthcare professionals. Nonetheless, Jahan & Al-Saigul give credible guidelines promoting the effective application of PCH research (Jahan & Al-Saigul, 2017). They stress the benefits of having a central governing body that regulates all of the contingent operations Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics Essay Paper
Search the GCU Library and find one new health care article that uses quantitative research. Do not use an article from a previous assignment, or that appears in the Topic Materials or textbook. Complete an article analysis and ethics evaluation of the research using the \”Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics\” template. See Chapter 5 of your textbook as needed, for assistance. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.