Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Case Analysis
Remove the ventilator and the tube feeding
The case of the 92 year-old patient reveals the importance of taking the right decision on the ground of the patient’s will and health condition. The decision to remove the ventilator and the tube feeding is grounded on both factors, i.e. the condition of the patient and on his will. The will of the patient states clearly that he does not want any DNR. This means that the patient created his will and made his decision in case he has serious health problems. The patient expressed himself clearly that he does not want to maintain his life, in case of serious health problems. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Case Analysis To put it more precisely, the patient does not want any DNR that means that he does not want to maintain his life with the help of the medical equipment, if he cannot breath independently and if his heart cannot work independently (Zoch, 2000). In case of the patient, he cannot breath without ventilation and he needs the tube to receive nutrition to maintain his body living. As he has expressed his will not to use any DNR, then it would be the reasonable decision to stop ventilation and tube feeding. Such a decision matches common medical practices and the decision has also the legal ground, the will, which the patient has created beforehand. This is why the decision to stop the ventilation and the tube feeding is reasonable, rational, and legally justified. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Case Analysis
At this point, it is worth mentioning the fact that, today, health care professionals tend to take the proactive ground in the decision concerning treatment of patients that require effective solutions in regard to the treatment of patients, who face end of life issues and suffer serious health problems with no or little chance of survival.Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Case Analysis