Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay Discussion Paper

Mental Health Minnesota is an organization dedicated to providing high-quality services. In the United States, the organization offers medical and therapeutic care to mentally ill individuals. The corporation makes sure all the programs are available to patients of long-term care facilities. To satisfy the growing needs of clients, the organization has established skilled nursing centers, community-based and adult residences, and rehabilitation centers. Mental Health Minnesota takes a collaborative strategy to mental wellbeing in order to fulfill its primary directives. This approach is beneficial because it means that psychiatric resources are fully integrated into a holistic treatment framework.

ORDER YOUR PAPER HERE

Moreover, this kind of alignment should be compatible with the host setting’s protocols and policies. When it comes to service efficiency, the business is stringent. It is for this purpose that it is dedicated to hiring knowledgeable and highly motivated practitioners. In order to attract a larger audience, the firm has collaborated with many healthcare organizations. As a result, internal and external forces affect the success of Mental Health Minnesota, causing them to change Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay Discussion Paper.

Degree to which Change has been Disruptive

The implementation of change by Mental Health Minnesota has had an enormous impact on service delivery. While several people were initially resistant to reform, the problem was eventually resolved when a sensitization program was implemented. Many operations inside the company have been interrupted as a result of this form of opposition. Management has intervened to cope with such disruptions by using appropriate management tools. Resistance to transition may be attributed to several factors. To begin with, the majority of healthcare workers see automation as a potential challenge to their careers. Additionally, particular organization’s members did not want to follow a different corporate culture, so they preferred to keep things like they were. Various negotiation techniques were used to overcome employee aversion to transition. For example, management decided to host stakeholder meetings regularly to talk regarding change information. During the conference, both concerned parties argued for the procurement of modern equipment to make decision-making easier and reduce opposition powers. The level of care provided to patients has dramatically improved over time since the equipment was purchased. This is because technology is critical in ensuring that new technology is wholly used in meeting the rising needs of patients Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay Discussion Paper.

Furthermore, technological advancements also aided the company’s foray into research and growth, resulting in the development of innovative goods and services. Many companies are unable to provide any of the modern products and services. As a consequence, Mental Health Minnesota would be able to outperform the rivalry. Around the same time, the company’s image has grown considerably in the United States. The corporation occasionally meets senior management to address the challenges of transition.

The corporation also collaborates actively with visible sponsors to overcome any barriers to progress.

Strategies used in Change Plan

Mental Health Minnesota has previously reacted to change, a practice that has continued to this day. The company’s ability to respond to change stems from the complex essence of the environment in which it works. As a result, certain factors at work have prompted and continue to drive the organization to implement the new step. Some of these powers operate on an internal level, while others operate on a superficial level. Mental Health Minnesota has been driven to reform by internal factors like corporate culture, workforce diversity, and leadership styles. The competitive environment, the economy, and technology, on the other hand, are among the external factors pushing this business to reform. Because all Mental Health Minnesota stakeholders desire better service efficiency, the organization employs various techniques in the transition process. The company utilizes the Kurt Lewin organizational change paradigm to do this. Unfreezing, changing the design, and refreezing are the three phases of this paradigm. The model’s first stage is to figure out that the company is falling behind in patient care delivery. As such, the administration has been charged with obtaining details on all staff from the human resource department in order to solve this problem.

Using this technique, the administration found that inadequate service quality is caused by a lack of morale, poor working conditions, and improper communication, among other factors Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay Discussion Paper.

Effect of Change to Stakeholders

The management has addressed this problem by instituting a reward scheme to incentivize workers to work harder. However, this decision has resulted in lower returns for stakeholders. The administration has also pledged a solid communication channel to ensure that all employees have accessibility to information. The administration has vowed to incorporate all of the improvements made during the refreezing period. The owners are pleased with how the management is coping with transition, so this step has pleased them. Simultaneously, a modern approach has been implemented, in which the new changes are integrated into the structure. As a result, all parties would have access to any details at any moment.

Moreover, the stakeholders have agreed to a new plan that would enhance all workers’ working conditions. As a result, this approach entails the procurement of machines that will allow for the fast retrieval of patient data. Computers often help to increase connectivity within the business, making decision-making easier. The company has long benefited from emerging technologies because it has made it easier to hire competent and skilled employees (Cameron & Green, 2015) Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay Discussion Paper.

Internal and external pressures, as per the management of Mental Health Minnesota, contribute significantly to shaping the output of different stakeholders within the organization. The internal and external factors discussed earlier caused the transition that has occurred. Some of the guidelines, for example, have been changed to make room for new concerns. Collaboration between different departments within this company has resulted in this type of transition. As a result of this versatility, the quality of care provided to patients has dramatically increased. Externally, the organization has adapted to technological and competitive developments. Universal rules have since been implemented to guarantee that the organization understands the necessity to adopt technologies in order to satisfy the increasing demands of patients. Due to the developments in the technological market, the corporation has acquired a modern computer that uses the internet to stay up with the changing world. Currently, the organization is reacting to visible shifts in the healthcare industry that are bringing competition. The firm has diversified its operations strategies in order to perform consistently in the market. As such, the firm has increased its research and innovation capabilities to produce new services that are not available from competitors. The implementation of innovative products and services has aided the corporation in overcoming the fierce competition in the healthcare industry in the United States.

ORDER YOUR PAPER HERE

Overall Implications of the Change

Numerous sectors in this organization have already experienced the effects of change. Change has mainly aided departmental coordination. This is due to the corporation’s adoption of information technologies in the enterprise. Employees of the organization can now obtain information in real-time thanks to the usage of digital technologies. For this reason, the administration can make choices that impact the whole organization efficiently. Some departments have grown as a result of the change paradigm. This is due to the fact that specific departments have actively collaborated with other non-governmental organizations, which provide them with funding. The funds would aid in the company’s core transformation, allowing various departments to work together to offer care to patients (Lorenzi & Riley, 2013) Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay Discussion Paper.

Leaders Preparedness to Change

Mental Health Minnesota, from my perspective, has viewed transition as a path to progress. This is why the administration has put a greater focus on it. According to research, technology affects any area of the business in any way. Besides, there has been a shift in this area. Because the setting is dynamic, these changes occur. As a result, the organization has reserved sufficient funds to deal with any changes brought on by technological advances. For example, additional resources have been allocated to ensure that the corporation forms mutual alliances with non-governmental organizations throughout the United States. Staff members are critical to the corporation’s ability to change. This is because the majority of workers are professionals and are familiar with the complexities of transition. This organization’s administration always takes the opportunity to inform all employees of the company’s current course (Aslam et al., 2018). In this situation, practical cooperation is critical to ensuring that there is little opposition to change Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay Discussion Paper.

Modifications to the Change Plan

Some changes should be made to this organization’s approach to dealing with transition. To begin, the administration of Mental Health Minnesota should devote more time to detecting transition resistance. Prior to implementing the new change, the organization could also introduce more sensitization activities. This would assist with decreasing any cases of transition resistance. Moreover, the corporation’s administration should implement a thorough follow-up process to see how well the change is going.

Conclusively, in every organization, change is imminent. This is because companies work in a constantly changing world. Some of the forces that cause transition are internal, whereas others can come externally. This is why the Mental Health Minnesota administration uses various communication mechanisms to convey a change in the organization. Effective communication is critical because it decreases employee aversion to change Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay Discussion Paper.

References

Aslam, U., Muqadas, F., Imran, M. K., & Ubaid-Ur-Rahman, U. (2018). Exploring the sources and role of knowledge sharing to overcome the challenges of organizational change implementation. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 26(3), 567-581. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-07-2017-1189

Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2015). Making sense of change management: a complete guide to the models, tools and techniques of organizational change. Kogan Page Publishers. http://www.gbv.de/dms/zbw/812398408.pdf

Lorenzi, N. M., & Riley, R. T. (2013). Managing personal stress. Organizational Aspects Health Informatics, 235-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4184-1_13

Lozano, R. (2013). Are companies planning their organisational changes for corporate sustainability? An analysis of three case studies on resistance to change and their strategies to overcome it. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(5), 275-295. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1290

ORDER HERE

In today’s fast-paced and global community, most organizations are faced with constant change. Research contemporary organizations that are currently responding to a significant change within the industry, such as disruptive technology; state, government, or industry regulations; environmental constraints; judicial or legislative rulings; etc. Choose one organization from your research that has recently responded to major change, or is currently responding to change. Write a paper (1,250-1,500 words) discussing how well the organization is responding to the change dynamics. Include the following: Describe the organization and the change to which it is responding. Discuss the degree to which the change has been disruptive and how the organization has responded to the dynamics created by this change. Evaluate the strategies the organization used in its change plan and determine the level of success the organization experienced with the strategies. Determine the effect the change had on stakeholders, and to what degree stakeholders have resisted. Assess how well stakeholder resistance was addressed. Evaluate the overall implications the change had on interdepartmental collaboration. In your opinion, how well did the leaders of the organization respond and prepare for the change? What worked and what did not work with the strategies they implemented? What modifications would you suggest the leaders of the organization make in order to better address the change dynamics? What additional strategies would you recommend to assist the organization through this change? Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the 7th edition of APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion Contemporary Organization Evaluation Essay Discussion Paper