Human Subjects Research Protection Essay Discussion Paper
Description
For this assignment, you will visit the The Research Clinic: https://ori.hhs.gov/TheResearchClinicVideo/
You will click to play Jan Klein, RN. Work your way through the brief videos, choosing the best response as the RN assisting in research. Upon completing the videos, using what you learned from the videos and the readings, you will submit a Word file that summarizes:
- The essential elements of informed consent
- Special populations that require special legal and ethical research considerations
- The nurse’s role in advocating for the patient in research situations
This assignment will be in APA format and will require a separate title and reference page. Your summary should be between 200-300 words Human Subjects Research Protection Essay Discussion Paper
ORDER YOUR PAPER HERE
- Journal articles must be 2013-2018
- 3 point per day deduction for late assignments
- Suggested headings to guide your paper are listed below
Suggested HeadingsTitle of Paper (centered, not bolded)
Essential Elements of Informed Consent (centered, bolded, first letter capitalization)
Special Populations (centered, bolded, first letter capitalization)
Nurses Role in Research Situations (centered, bolded, first letter capitalization)
Conclusion (if you choose to use this heading it would be centered, bolded) but it is preferred to simply state…In conclusion, at the beginning of the paragraph Human Subjects Research Protection Essay Discussion Paper
I HAVE ATTACHED THE LINK FOR THE VIDEO FOR THIS POST. WILL ALSO ATTACH THE RUBRIC. PLEASE FOLLOW EXACT RUBRIC TO COMPLETE THE PAPER.
PLAGIARISM WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. WILL BE PUT IN AN ONLINE SITE TO TEST PLAGIARISM, PLEASE FOLLOW RUBRIC OR ASSIGNMENT WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
NRSE 4550 RUBRIC: MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT 6: WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT – HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION (30 pts) Criteria Accomplished Proficient Poor Not Acceptable 2 Peer-Reviewed References are provided in correct APA format 5 to 5 Points 3 to 4 Points 1 to 2 Points 0 to 0 Points References are correctly referenced in proper APA 6th ed. format 2 references provided; References have less than 2 APA errors Only 1 reference is provided or references have 2-3 APA errors Reference is NOT in APA format or has more than 3 errors Essential elements of informed consent are discussed 5 to 5 Points 3 to 4 Points 1 to 2 Points 0 to 2 Points 3 or more key elements of informed consent are discussed. Most key elements of informed consent are discussed, but one key element is missing. Less than 3 key elements are discussed Key elements of informed consent not addressed. Special vulnerable populations in research are identified and discussed 7 to 8 Points 5 to 6 Points 3 to 4 Points 0 to 2 Points Correctly identifies the type of studies and provides an appropriate explanation Correctly identifies 3 or more vulnerable research populations, but discussion is lacking. Correctly identifies 3 or more vulnerable research populations, but does not fully discuss; Identifies only 2 vulnerable research populations Human Subjects Research Protection Essay Discussion Paper.
ORDER YOUR PAPER HERE
Correctly identifies 1 or fewer vulnerable research populations; fails to discuss vulnerable populations in research Discusses the role of the nurse in advocating for the patient in research situations 7 to 7 Points 4 to 6 Points 2 to 4 Points 0 to 1 Points Provides a full, in-depth discussion of the role of the nurse in advocating for the patient in research Provides an adequate discussion of the role of the nurse in advocating for the patient in research, but is somewhat lacking. Provides a superficial discussion of the role of the nurse in advocating for the patient in research Provides no discussion or lacks a logical discussion of the role of the nurse in advocating for the patient in research. Discussion is well-written and free of grammatical and mechanical errors 5 to 5 Points 3 to 4 Points 1 to 2 Points 0 to 0 Points Provides a well-written discussion, free of grammatical and mechanical areas. Provides a mostly well-written discussion with fewer than 3 grammatical and mechanical errors. Provides a fair or poor discussion with 3-4 grammatical and mechanical errors. Discussion is poorly written; illogical; difficult or impossible to read; Includes 5 or more grammatical or mechanical errors (Does not include APA) Last updated: 10/09/2018 © 2018 School of Nursing Ohio University Page 1 of 1 Human Subjects Research Protection Essay Discussion Paper