Policy Analysis Assignment Discussion Paper

Policy Analysis Assignment Discussion Paper

Assignment

Examine how frameworks from nursing and other disciplines can work together to inform policy analysis.   

A policy analysis framework is a tool that attempts to advance better understanding of policies, particularly their differential impacts as well as how to produce socially just and include outcomes. In fact, the frameworks focus on improving understanding of how a policy affects diverse populations, to include precise identification of who is excluded and who benefits from the policy, along with the priorities, goals and related resource allocation for the policy. Through integrating frameworks from nursing and other disciplines, nurses can develop a tool that informs policy analysis with regards to capturing and responding to multi-level interacting power structures, factors, forces and social locations with regards to how they shape and influence health and human life. It is notable that the different frameworks can work together to better illuminate how the policy constructs relative power and privileges within groups and between individuals vis-à-vis wellbeing, health, political status, economic status, and social status (Portche, 2022) Policy Analysis Assignment Discussion Paper.

ORDER YOUR PAPER HERE

This is especially the case when the intersectionality of a policy is considered in terms of no reducing human lives to a single characteristic. Prioritizing any one factor would make it difficult to understand the effect of a policy. Rather, a constellation of factors should be considered since the different factors are inseparable and are shaped by interactions between structures and processes. Intersectionality as pursued by merging different frameworks helps in encouraging critical reflection that allows for movement beyond the singular categories that are typically favored in policy analysis, such as gender in gender-based analysis.  In addition, the combination of frameworks allows for the analysis to move beyond the enumerated list of factors/determinants often found in assessments to consider the complex interactions and relationships between the mutually constituting factors. This enables an examination of simultaneous impact of relevant structures and systems to more accurately map and conceptualize the policy in and beyond health (Schwartz & Meltzer, 2019) Policy Analysis Assignment Discussion Paper.

In essence, frameworks can work together to inform policy analysis in three ways. First, providing an innovative structure for critical policy analysis by focusing on particular areas of interest, such as looking at who benefits and who is harmed by the policy. Second, capturing the different dimensions of the policy context, to include intersecting social locations, diverse knowledge, everyday lived experiences, policies and history. Third, generating transformative insights, actions, policy solutions, and knowledge that cannot be gleaned from using a single framework or a nursing framework. In this respect, different frameworks can work together to foreground the complex contexts of health and social problems, and ultimately making the results of the policy analysis more useful in terms of targeted areas of interest (Peter & Fontaine, 2020) Policy Analysis Assignment Discussion Paper.

References

Peters, B. G., & Fontaine, G. (Eds.) (2020). Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Comparative Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.

Porche, D. J. (2022). Health Policy: Application for Nurses and Other Healthcare Professionals. Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC.

Schwartz, A. F., & Meltzer, R. (2019). Policy Analysis as Problem Solving: A Flexible and Evidence-based Framework. Routledge.

Week 4: Policy Analysis Frameworks Consider the social contract between the nursing profession and consumers of health care. This social contract has long been demonstrated by nurses. For example, recall the nursing pioneer Lillian Wald who in the late 1800s worked to improve the health and welfare of the immigrant population in New York. How does engaging in the policy process assist nurses with fulfilling this social contract today? To better influence health and nursing policy, which seeks to improve health and quality outcomes, nurses need to develop their policy acumen. Utilizing a policy analysis framework can assist in this process. This week continues the examination of the policy process addressed in Week 3. You will examine how frameworks from nursing and other disciplines can work together to inform policy analysis. Learning Objectives Students will: Propose a policy analysis framework for a specific policy issue Conduct a comprehensive policy analysis critically analyzing a health policy from multiple contexts Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment] Continue to work on this Assignment, assigned in Week 4. You will need to incorporate any related topics addressed this week. Your policy analysis paper is due by Day 7 of this week. Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper Program LOs: 4, 5 4: Professions/Collaborators 5: Effective Communicators DNP Essentials: 5, 6 5: Healthcare Policy for Advocacy in Healthcare 6: Interprofessional collaboration for Improving Patient and Population Health Outcomes (Scroll down for table) Policy Analysis Assignment Discussion Paper

ORDER YOUR PAPER HERE

ASSIGNMENT PROMPT Target 5 points Acceptable 3 points Unacceptable 1 point Score/Level Policy analysis paper Part 1: Definition of policy issue Program LO: 4, 5 DNP Essential: 5, 6 Exemplary quality. Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment; how the issue affects the policy arena; current politics of the issue; level in the policy making process using advanced critical thinking skills; does not summarize or paraphrase the content of the literature review; instead, demonstrates content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work. Fully meets expectations for LOs 4 and 5. Fully meets expectations for Essentials 5 and 6. Well-developed good quality work. Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses at least 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; includes some summarizing or paraphrasing of literature review; demonstration of content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstration of an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. It fully meets expectations for graduate level work. Meets expectations for LOs 4, 5. Meets expectations for Essentials 5, 6. Superficially developed, unacceptable quality. Content needs substantial revision for it to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of main ideas from the literature review; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding. Lags behind expectations for graduate level work. Insufficient to meet expectations for LOs 4, 5. Insufficient to meet expectations for Essentials 5, 6. Part 2: Application of a policy analysis framework Program LO: 4, 5 DNP Essential: 5, 6. Exemplary quality. Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment; social, ethical, legal, historical, economic, and theoretical contexts explored; stakeholders and position statements discussed using advanced critical thinking skills; does not summarize or paraphrase the content of the literature review; instead, demonstrates content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work. Fully meets expectations for LOs 4 and 5. Fully meets expectations for Essentials 5 and 6. Policy Analysis Assignment Discussion Paper

Well-developed good quality work. Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses about 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; includes some summarizing or paraphrasing of literature review; demonstration of content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstration of an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. It meets expectations for graduate level work. Meets expectations for LOs 4, 5. Meets expectations for Essentials 5, 6. Superficially developed, unacceptable quality. Content needs substantial revision for it to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of main ideas from the literature review; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding. Lags behind expectations for graduate level work. Insufficient to meet expectations for LOs 4, 5. Insufficient to meet expectations for Essentials 5, 6. Part 3: Presentation of policy options and/or solutions Program LOs: 4, 5. DNP Essential: 5, 6. Exemplary quality. Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment; discussion of 3 policy options, including theoretical, advocacy and collaborative elements; pros and cons of each using advanced critical thinking skills; does not summarize or paraphrase the content of the literature review; instead, demonstrates content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work. Fully meets expectations for LOs 4 and 5. Fully meets expectations for Essentials 5 and 6. Well-developed good quality work. Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses about 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; includes some summarizing or paraphrasing of literature review; demonstration of content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstration of an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. It meets expectations for graduate level work. Meets expectations for LOs 4, 5. Meets expectations for Essentials 5, 6. Superficially developed, unacceptable quality. Content needs substantial revision for it to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of main ideas from the literature review; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding. Lags behind expectations for graduate level work. Insufficient to meet expectations for LOs 4, 5. Insufficient to meet expectations for Essentials 5, 6. Part 4: Plan for building consensus Program LOs: 4, 5. DNP Essential: 5, 6. Exemplary quality. Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment; discussion of 3 policy options, including and includes strategies for how to persuade others and / or build consensus using advanced critical thinking skills; does not summarize or paraphrase the content of the literature review; instead, demonstrates content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work. Fully meets expectations for LOs 4 and 5. Fully meets expectations for Essentials 5 and 6. Well-developed good quality work. Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses about 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; includes some summarizing or paraphrasing of literature review; demonstration of content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstration of an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. It meets expectations for graduate level work. Meets expectations for LOs 4, 5. Meets expectations for Essentials 5, 6. Superficially developed, unacceptable quality. Content needs substantial revision for it to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of main ideas from the literature review; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding. Lags behind expectations for graduate level work. Insufficient to meet expectations for LOs 4, 5. Insufficient to meet expectations for Essentials 5, 6. Part 5: References and page requirements The majority of references are from scholarly journals, supports the topic well, and are current. Paper stays within page requirements. APA format used correctly throughout Policy Analysis Assignment Discussion Paper.

ORDER YOUR PAPER HERE

Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work. Most references are from scholarly journals and support the topic. Most references are fairly current. The paper stays within requirements. APA format used with minimal errors. Meets expectations for graduate level work. References are not sufficient or are mostly from the lay literature or out of date. The paper is either too long or too short. Weak writing quality and/or little evidence of correctness of APA format. Work lags behind expectations for graduate level work. Grammar and APA formatting Up to 5 points (20%) may be deducted for errors in grammar and/or APA style. Assignment: Write an 8–10-page analysis paper (including references) in which you succinctly address the following: • Part 1: Define the policy issue. (5 points) o How is the issue affecting the policy arena? o What are the current politics of the issue? o At what level in the policy making process is the issue? • Part 2: Apply a policy analysis framework to explore the issue using the following contexts (5 points): o Social o Ethical o Legal o Historical o Financial / economic o Theoretical underpinnings of the policy • Include in this section: o Who are the stakeholders of interest? o Is there a nursing policy / position statement on this health care issue? If so, who developed it? • Part 3: Policy options / solutions (5 points) o What are the policy options / solutions for addressing the issue? Include at least three levels of options / solutions: no change; partial change; radical change or maximum change. o What are the theoretical underpinnings of the policy options / solutions? o What are the health advocacy aspects and leadership requirements of each option? o How does each option / solution provide an opportunity or need for interprofessional collaboration? o What are the pros and cons of each suggested change? Include the cost benefits, effectiveness, and efficiency of each option along with the utility and feasibility of each option. • Part 4: Building Consensus (5 points) o Outline a plan for building consensus around your recommended option / solution for solving the policy issue. • Part 5: References (5 points) o Limit your references so this section is no more than 2 pages. *Note: Up to 5 points (20%) may be deducted for errors in grammar and/or APA style. OLD NEW Target Worthy of a professional portfolio; addresses every major subsection in the assignment; Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment; Acceptable Needs revision to be worthy of a professional portfolio; addresses about 75% of the major subsections in the assignment Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses about 80% of the major subsections in the assignment Unacceptable Needs substantial revision to be worthy of a professional portfolio; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment Content needs substantial revision for it to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment Policy Analysis Assignment Discussion Paper